National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission)
institutionIntelligence & Surveillance
The official account - held here as evidence, not as the end of the argument.
Who they are
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, chaired by Thomas Kean[1].
What they do
The engine treats the Commission as an institutional actor whose findings are data, not as an authority that closes questions.
How it works
Two of its findings sit in this map with the countervailing record beside them: its conclusion that no one profited on advance knowledge of the attacks, and its account of the air-defence failure, where the Commission itself records controllers asking whether what they were seeing was 'real-world or exercise'. It is also one of the bodies whose handling of the Able Danger material was put to the Pentagon's Inspector General in 2006.
Why it matters
Holding it this way is deliberate. Its findings are quoted at length and in full, including the parts of its reasoning that are usually dropped - and then set against the peer-reviewed work that reached different results on narrower questions.
The engine's record — word for word
Statutory commission, chaired by Thomas H. Kean with Lee H. Hamilton as vice chair; members Richard Ben-Veniste, Fred F. Fielding, Jamie S. Gorelick, Slade Gorton, Bob Kerrey, John F. Lehman, Timothy J. Roemer and James R. Thompson. Its report is the baseline institutional account. Two of its findings are held in canon on their own nodes with the countervailing record beside them: the securities-trading finding at pre_911_options_trading ("Exhaustive investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, FBI, and other agencies have uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions"), and the air-defence account whose drill-overlap context canon records at exercise_as_cover, where the Commission itself documents NEADS confusion over whether the morning's events were "real-world or exercise". The Commission is also one of the bodies whose handling of Able Danger material was put to the DoD Inspector General in 2006 by Representatives Hoekstra and Wolf. Canon treats the Commission as an institutional actor whose findings are evidence, not as an authority whose findings close a question.
Follow the trail
Walk this on the live map →