◉ PSYCHOHISTORY

Tektology

nodeDarknet & Cyber
A science meant to build a better world was also used to control people as one giant organism.
Who they are

Alexander Bogdanov, a Russian scientist who invented Tektology.

What they do

Tektology is called a universal science of organization, but it also serves as a tool to control what some call the 'human super-organism'.

How it works

Bogdanov proposed Tektology in 1913 as a universal science of organization. It aimed to study the basic principles of how matter, life, and mind are organized. It is now seen as a forerunner of systems theory and cybernetics. But in one context, it is used to control the 'human super-organism'. This means it was presented as a way to improve humankind, while also being a means to manage people as a single body.

Why it matters

It shows how a theory for a better world can also be a way to control people.

The engine's record — word for word
The corpus records: "Next, the Marburg school , with thinkers like Hermann Cohen , considers the challenges of turning ethical ideas into fixed laws – an issue connected to Bogdanov’s concept of Tektology , which in this context is used to control what some might consider the ' human super-organism '." It is presented publicly as: "Simona Poustilnik’s paper, ‘ Alexsandr Bogdanov’s Tektology: A Science of Reconstruction ‘ 8 details that Tektology is meant as a universal science of organisation , leading to a better world and humankind, but that it further serves as a precursor of not only Bertanalffy’s General Systems Theory , but also Norbert Weiner’s Cybernetics ." Documents named in the corpus: Tektology; Tektology (1913-28); Tektology (1913); Tektology 30; General Systems Theory; Cybernetics. Cross-sourced to americanaffairsjournal.org, monoskop.org, systemsthinkingalliance.org — documents cited by the corpus and retrieved independently of it.
Follow the trail
Walk this on the live map →
Part of the Psychohistory engine — 2,750 entities, 6,993 documented connections. Open data, built to be proven wrong.