◉ PSYCHOHISTORY

Lanning Report (1992) — FBI Behavioral Science Unit on Allegations of 'Ritual' Child Abuse

nodeIntelligence & Surveillance · Occult & Esoteric
The FBI man who went looking for satanic cults started out believing in them — and after eighteen years had found none.
Who they are

Kenneth Lanning of the FBI's Behavioral Science Unit, who spent his career on crimes against children.

What they do

His 1992 guide for investigators on allegations of 'ritual' child abuse.

How it works

He is explicit about where he started: 'I tended to believe them.' And about his own position: 'I have devoted more than seven years part-time, and eleven years full-time, of my professional life to researching, training, and consulting in the area of the sexual victimization of children... I have no reason to deny their existence or nature.' His finding: 'in none of the cases of which I am aware has any evidence of a well-organized satanic cult been found.' He sets out seven other explanations — confused memory, childhood fear, a pushy interviewer, a story retold until it changed — before he ever reaches the question of lying.

Why it matters

His most important line cuts against easy dismissal: 'A horror-filled yet inaccurate account of victimization is not only not a counterindication of abuse, but is in fact a corroborative indicator of extreme physical, psychological, and/or sexual abuse.' The story can be wrong and something real can still have happened.

The engine's record — word for word
[Report #191] Kenneth V. Lanning, FBI Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. Where he started, verbatim: 'In 1983 and 1984, when I first began to hear stories of what sounded like satanic or occult activity in connection with allegations of sexual victimization of children... I tended to believe them. I had been dealing with bizarre, deviant behavior for many years and had long since realized that almost anything is possible.' His standing: 'I have devoted more than seven years part-time, and eleven years full-time, of my professional life to researching, training, and consulting in the area of the sexual victimization of children... I have no reason to deny their existence or nature.' His finding: 'in none of the cases of which I am aware has any evidence of a well-organized satanic cult been found.' On scale: 'We now have hundreds of victims alleging that thousands of offenders are abusing and even murdering tens of thousands of people as part of organized satanic cults, and there is little or no corroborative evidence.' A magnitude test he applies: 'Those who accept these stories of mass human sacrifice would have us believe that the satanists and other occult practitioners are murdering more than twice as many people every year in this country as all the other murderers combined.' The report sets out seven 'Alternative Explanations' — pathological distortion, traumatic memory, normal childhood fears and fantasy, misperception/confusion/trickery, overzealous intervenors, urban legends, combination — in a section preceding its separate section on whether victims lie. And, verbatim: 'A horror-filled yet inaccurate account of victimization is not only not a counterindication of abuse, but is in fact a corroborative indicator of extreme physical, psychological, and/or sexual abuse.' [Report #193] Held side by side with goodman_ritual_abuse_study_1994, the NCCAN-funded national survey published two years later, which reached a parallel result on the organised-cult component while finding religion-related abuse frequently corroborated. The two are independent documents by different authors; Goodman cites Lanning.
Follow the trail
Walk this on the live map →
Part of the Psychohistory engine — 2,750 entities, 6,993 documented connections. Open data, built to be proven wrong.