Alexander Bogdanov, who adopted the framework and then objected to it.
The record calls it empiriomonism.
Bogdanov took an existing framework and objected that the world was not only a question of empirical fact. He argued it was also about how that fact translated into collective experience. That objection led to his empiriomonism. It is presented publicly as merging Marxism with Machian empiricism, promising to interpret objective data through a collectively-subjective lens, and leading to a global ethic. The cited documents say that in Book Three, Bogdanov argues empiriomonism is superior to G.
It shows a framework presented as a way to read objective data, while its own author said the facts alone were not the point. The record does not establish a funding line or institutional binding, and it does not establish that empiriomonism is an operational governance doctrine.