◉ PSYCHOHISTORY

Defense Production Act Title III (1950)

statutoryAI & Compute
There's a Cold War law that lets the government force a private company to build what it wants, no consent required.
Who they are

Defense Production Act Title III, a 1950 statute giving the executive branch sweeping power over private industry for defense needs.

What they do

It lets the government prioritize contracts, control supply chains, and legally compel companies to change their products regardless of their own terms of service.

How it works

In February 2026 it was threatened against AI company Anthropic after CEO Dario Amodei refused a demand from official Hegseth; the engine reads it as the hard-power fallback, parallel to normal defense contracting but used to compel when a company won't cooperate voluntarily.

Why it matters

It shows the state doesn't need a company's permission when it can legally force compliance, making it the escalation path when consent is refused.

The engine's record — word for word
Cold War statute granting executive branch sweeping authority to prioritize contracts, control supply chains, and legally force private companies to adapt products to meet national defense needs regardless of corporate terms of service. Invocation threatened against Anthropic Feb 2026 after Dario Amodei refused the Hegseth ultimatum. Engine read: DPA Title III as the hard-power backchannel; the state does not need consent when it can compel. Parallel to JWCC/C2S procurement — but DPA is the escalation path when consent is withheld.
Follow the trail
Walk this on the live map →
Part of the Psychohistory engine — 2,437 entities, 6,337 documented connections. Open data, built to be proven wrong.