◉ PSYCHOHISTORY

CBDCs

artifactMoney & Finance · Intelligence & Surveillance · Nations & Geopolitics · Crypto & Digital ID
A government-issued digital currency can be set to expire, restrict where you spend, tax you instantly, or freeze on command.
Who they are

Central bank digital currencies — government digital money, coordinated through the Bank for International Settlements[1].

What they do

The engine frames them as rationing and control infrastructure, since programmable money means programmable behavior. Corrections from the audit: the American anti-CBDC bill passed only the House (July 2025) and is NOT law — the state's own digital money is stalled, not banned — while the stablecoin law that did pass channels programmable money through private companies the government can still order to freeze, seize or burn. Europe's central banks have publicly promised their digital money will 'never be programmable' — a promise now on the record next to the capability.

How it works

BIS chief Carstens said the bank would have 'absolute control' over the rules and the technology to enforce them. BIS runs pilots like mBridge (2024), Icebreaker, Dunbar, and Mariana. China's e-CNY pays interest, turning it into 'digital deposit money,' and in its final 'Going Direct' form the central bank puts money straight into wallets, bypassing regular banks. Built-in features can include expiration, geographic and category limits, negative rates, real-time taxation, and remote freeze — with every transaction logged in one central database.

Why it matters

Whoever writes the rules of the currency can dictate what you buy, where, and whether your money stays usable.

The engine's record — word for word
Central bank digital currencies. Rationing infrastructure. Joulework energy allocation. Programmable money = programmable behavior. Carstens (BIS GM): "absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of the currency, and the technology to enforce that." BIS coordinates: mBridge (MVP 2024), Icebreaker, Dunbar, Mariana. China e-CNY paying interest on wallets = "digital deposit money." Going Direct terminal form: central bank injects directly into wallets, bypassing commercial banking. Every transaction = centralized database entry. Programmable features: expiration, geographic restriction, category restriction, negative rates, real-time taxation, remote freeze. Report #178: the substrate-vs-announcement instance sharpened — the retail CBDC is rejected in public while identical ledger legibility arrives through GENIUS-Act private rails. The control layer ships distributed and privately branded, not as a visible government grid. [Report #189 — verified to the enacted/engrossed texts] H.R. 1919 ('Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act'): House-passed Jul 17, 2025 (Roll 201, 219-210) — a Federal reserve bank 'may not... issue a central bank digital currency, or any digital asset that is substantially similar under any other name or label,' including 'indirectly... through a financial institution or other intermediary' — BUT IT IS NOT LAW: never passed the Senate; folded into S. 1318 (Apr 2026), pending. The state's own retail ledger is STALLED, not banned — while the GENIUS Act (enacted PL 119-27, Jul 18 2025) channels programmability to private issuers: the mask-rotation held at that strength, with the standing counterweight that the state retains freeze-seize-burn command of the private ledger (the GENIUS NPRM surfaces). Project Rosalind precised (BIS/BoE final report Jun 16, 2023, 33 API endpoints): its programmability is USER-CONSENTED conditional locks ('conditions that they have agreed in advance') — not state-imposed purchase restrictions; the distinction is load-bearing. COUNTER-INDICATOR on the record: the ECB ('would never be programmable money') and the BoE (the digital pound 'won't be programmable') have both publicly forsworn programmability — announcement-layer commitments, held beside the capability record. Expiring money: analyzed in a World Bank STAFF BLOG (Bossone & Faragallah, Nov 2022, Gesell/Wörgl frame) — blog tier, not an institutional report; the capability exists in the Rosalind lock design (all locks carry expiry), enactment nowhere.
Follow the trail
Walk this on the live map →
Part of the Psychohistory engine — 2,750 entities, 6,993 documented connections. Open data, built to be proven wrong.