The Project on Forward Engagement, which runs working groups and a graduate seminar on anticipatory governance[1].
The record calls it anticipatory governance — constraint based on forecast, enforced before the forecast is tested.
It is presented publicly as resting on four pillars: foresight to spot risks before they materialise, public engagement to contest design choices before they lock in, adaptive management to allow course correction, and circuit breakers to halt malfunctioning systems. The record links it to a Rockefeller Foundation funding line of $4.50B across global health, agricultural and economic policy. The record notes this does not establish control over the doctrine's content or use. The cited document describes it as a systems-based approach for enabling governance to cope with accelerating, complex forms of change.
It shows how rules can be locked in based on forecasts that have not yet been tested, with the people affected given a chance to contest the design only before it is fixed.