Paulson 1978: Does a Third Independent Arrival Settle Convergence vs Procurement?
Open questionThree men, inside about two years, all arrive at the same idea: reach for mind power, then give up and use a radio or a television instead. One was an Army lieutenant colonel in Washington, one a major writing on Army letterhead in San Francisco, one a private citizen in Boston who printed his own book. When you list every source each of them used, they share nothing — not one book between them. That looks like three people breathing the same air rather than one programme handing work down a chain. The argument against: no paper trail is not the same as no contact, the word 'MindWar' was already coined in 1977 before the Boston book was written, and the military had the whole subject mapped in 1972, so the ideas were in circulation. Held open until something names a link.
The engine's record — word for word
Three documents inside roughly two years reach the same instrument — reach for mind power, then route the work through broadcast. 'The Discipline of a Psychic Warrior' (Paulson, written 1978, first published 10 Jan 1979, no publisher, no clearance): telepathy chapter, then cells wired by short wave radio. Alexander, Military Review December 1980: psychotronics defined, ELF 'can be used to induce depression or irritability in a target population.' 'From PSYOP to MindWar' (Aquino + Vallely, finished no earlier than Dec 1980 because it opens by answering Alexander): psychotronics called 'weak, imprecise, and narrow', then television and radio.
**The evidence for independent convergence.** A citation diff run name by name returns ZERO shared sources between Alexander and the paper written to answer him — Alexander on DIA ST-CS-01-169-72 (1972), DST-1810S-387-75 (1975), Bearden, Ostrander + Schroeder; Aquino on Ravitz, Soyke + Edmonds, Playfair + Hill. Paulson cites nothing. Three disjoint bibliographies. No person-edge between Paulson and any of the officers appears in any record searched.
**The divergence.** Absence of a shared paper trail is not absence of contact, and three facts pull the other way: the term MindWar was coined with Col. Richard Sutter in **1977**, one year BEFORE Paulson wrote; the 1972 DIA study shows the full mechanism taxonomy was already inside military intelligence six years before Paulson, so a civilian could have absorbed it secondhand through the popular literature (Ostrander + Schroeder 1970 was a mass-market book); and Paulson describes himself as belonging to 'a small group didicated to using analytic techniques' whose membership is nowhere identified.
**What would settle it.** (a) Any document placing Paulson in contact with PSYOP, DIA or INSCOM personnel, or on a distribution list. (b) Identification of 'The Foundation' as anything other than one man — the Copyright Office records no organisation. (c) A named earlier common source cited by two of the three. Until one of those lands: HELD at independent convergence, with procurement continuity not excluded.
Walk this on the live map →